ActRight

The same shameless mainstream fact checkers that told us that under ObamaCare we could keep our insurance, keep our doctors, premiums wouldn't rise, and costs would decrease, have now declared it lying when Donald Trump repeats what Hillary Clinton actually said.

Over half of American voters surveyed in a recent poll disagree with the FBI’s decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton.

"Unbelievable."

Following news Friday about a potential new FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton, conservative talk radio host Glenn Beck predicted "a vote for Hillary is a vote for [Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim] Kaine" because the former secretary of state won't be in the Oval Office long, should she win...

The prophet Muhammad would be appalled by how current Islamic Fundamentalists are treating women under their control. This suppression is done in the nam...

“Anybody who supports Donald Trump or is a Republican is just hated.”

Minorities harassing & bullying a homeless woman who happens to be a Trump supporter. So much division nowadays D:

Kids Pick the President is a multiplatform grassroots campaign that empowers kids to be involved in the presidential election process. It has been part of Nickelodeon for the last 28 years, and 2016 marks the 8th presidential election cycle covered in depth by this project.

Take a good look at these videos as this is what America will be like under the Democratic Party rule ...

A homeless woman demonstrating quietly in support of Trump was harassed and assaulted by a group of bystanders near his Walk of Fame star.

Feminist Camille Paglia on Hillary Clinton: ‘The Woman Is a Disaster’

Hillary Clinton’s critics correctly warn that she could name one or more justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. But that would be just a start. As conservative activist Richard Viguerie has argued for years: “Personnel is policy.” A President Hillary Clinton would nominate hundreds of people to top positions that require Senate approval. She would hire hundreds of thousands of others and unleash them to perpetrate Hillaryism — a toxic blend of lies, elitist nannyism, secretive paranoia, and snarling contempt for the law. These people would enjoy police powers, fat salaries, mouth-watering benefits, and bullet-proof job security — at taxpayer expense. If Hillary nominated only one liberal jurist to replace the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, she could nudge the Court to the left for decades. Free speech, religious liberty, gun rights, separation of powers, free enterprise, federalism, and unborn Americans all would be in the cross hairs. But her influence would go far, far beyond that. Other Supreme Court vacancies could arise, of course. Thirteen federal appeals-court seats are empty. So are 77 federal trial-court benches. Also, 14 other judges have announced their plans to retire between now and June 2017. All told, by next Independence Day, Hillary could name 105 like-minded judges to these federal courts. And that’s just the judicial branch. Hillary would nominate 15 cabinet secretaries who share her collectivist vision. The secretaries of state, treasury, labor, transportation, and others, in turn, would be encircled by platoons of undersecretaries, deputy secretaries, assistant secretaries, and their secretaries. The federal government includes “137 independent executive agencies with 268 components,” according to USA.gov. Hillary would employ the heads of these bodies, including the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Internal Revenue Service, and many, many more. Beyond that, ad hoc boards, commissions, and blue-ribbon panels also would clamor for chiefs. And then we have the Indians. Obama employed at least 143,000 federal staffers during his first term, Investor’s Business Daily estimates. Hillary likely would hire as many federal workers in her image or merely leave thousands of Obamites in place and let them keep on keeping on. Neither prospect is appetizing. As a devoted disciple of Saul Alinsky, Hillary understands the first of his twelve Rules for Radicals. As a devoted disciple of Saul Alinsky, Hillary understands the first of his twelve Rules for Radicals: “Power is derived from two main sources — money and people. ‘Have-Nots’ must build power from flesh and blood.” Thus, she would hire smart, focused, far-left lawyers, economists, inspectors, and administrators to enter the bureaucracy, burrow like termites, and slowly nibble away at what remains of this beautiful country. Thousands of young Rodhamites could infest America’s federal agencies and cause incalculable damage until they retire — 30 or 40 years hence. #share#The flip side of this threat is a yuuuuuge opportunity: A President Trump would nominate his own candidates for the Supreme Court and lower benches. The 20 well-respected jurists whom he identified as potential justices all would return the High Court to a more constitutionalist path. So would his circuit- and district-court nominees. As for his cabinet appointees and top aides, just imagine these patriots working to clean up after Obama and help Trump make America great again: • Secretary of State Newt Gingrich • Treasury Secretary Steve Forbes • Defense Secretary KT McFarland • Attorney General Rudolph W. Giuliani • Health and Human Service Secretary Dr. Ben Carson • Office of Management and Budget Director Steve Moore • United Nations Ambassador Laura Ingraham • Council of Economic Advisors Chairman Arthur Laffer • CIA Director John Bolton • Federal Reserve Chairman Lawrence Kudlow While this dream team is almost too good to be true, some of these experts and activists already advise Trump and would help him govern. If asked, many of them would serve our country in a Trump Administration. #related#Those who worry about Hillary Clinton’s impact on the Supreme Court should meditate much more broadly about her hundreds of thousands of potential nominations and new hires — all across the federal government. In contrast to that frightful picture, visualize the conservative, free-market constitutionalists whom Donald J. Trump would place in those positions. Think carefully. Vote accordingly. — Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor with National Review Online. New York University master’s candidate William de Wolff furnished research for this article.

In the spirit of flashback Friday.

Survey by Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation says leftward turn in young people's views is due to lack of basic knowledge of history

Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein comments on the FBI's shocking Friday afternoon announcement that they are reopening the investigation into Hilary Clinton's email server because new evidence has come to light. CARL BERNSTEIN: Well, there's no question that the e-mails have always been the greatest threat to her candidacy for president, that her conduct in regard to the e-mails is really indefensible and if there was going to be more information that came out, it was the one thing, as I said on the air last night, actually that could really perhaps affect this election. We don't know what this means yet except that it's a real bombshell. And it is unthinkable that the Director of the FBI would take this action lightly, that he would put this letter forth to the Congress of the United States saying there is more information out there about classified e-mails and call it to the attention of congress unless it was something requiring serious investigation. So that's where we are... Is it a certainty that we won't learn before the election? I'm not sure it's a certainty we won't learn before the election. One thing is, it's possible that Hillary Clinton might want to on her own initiative talk to the FBI and find out what she can, and if she chooses to let the American people know what she thinks or knows is going on. People need to hear from her... I think if she has information available to her from the FBI or any other source as to her knowledge of what these e-mails might be, hopefully she will let us know what they are and what is under discussion here. Right now we're all talking in a vacuum but I want to adhere that in the last, oh, 36, 48 hours, there has been an undercurrent of kind of speculative discussion among some national security people that something might surface in the next few days about e-mails, and I think the expectation in this chatter -- and I took it as just chatter but informed chatter, to some extent -- was that it would relate to another round of WikiLeaks e-mails, which our Justice Department people seem to be saying is not the case, but there has been some noise in the national security community the last day or two of this kind of possibility of some kind of revelation. But this is her achilles heel and we have to remember that it also comes on the -- back to the word heel -- of the revelations about the Clinton Foundation. So the confluence of all of this is bad for her as it stands now but with some knowledge she might be able to stop, turn things around, and give us some idea of what's going on in a way we might not otherwise know, and also it's very possible that some members of congress very quickly are going to get an idea of what these e-mails are, and what this is all about, and for whatever purpose put some information out there.

Moments after the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced it would reopen the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server while serving as the secretary of state under ...

According to a report by the Yale Daily News, a recent survey revealed that conservative views are "unwelcome" on the Ivy League school's campus.

Back in August Donald Trump told a large crowd of supporters in Norwood, Massachusetts that Anthony Weiner (aka: Carlos Danger) ...

"Betraying his office!"

A Des Moines woman has been arrested on suspicion of voting twice this month in the general election, police and court records show.

Assistant Editorial Page Editor James Freeman writes that in polite media society only Republicans are supposed to feel bad about their candidate. But doesn’t Hillary Clinton embarrass Democrats?

This is the 3rd and last video, watch the first two videos first! Here they are: 1st video link: https://youtu.be/EhaTLfsbxbw 2nd video link: https://youtu.b...

Evan McMullin Hits Back At Attacks From Sean Hannity And Lou Dobbs: "What Do These Men Really Stand For?"