ActRight

Donald Trump cited email from a Clinton adviser but misconstrued it in the same way that a Kremlin-funded website had.

Outrage among Republicans about Mr. Trump has allowed Democrats to contemplate what was once unthinkable: taking the state for Hillary Clinton in November.

Conservative political commentator and media personality Glenn Beck said the election of Hillary Clinton as president by refusing to support Donald Trump is "a moral, ethical choice" for Republicans.

John Harwood, who moderated one of the Republican primary debates last year, corresponded often with Hillary Clinton's campaign chair.

Radio and TV personality Glenn Beck is a man without a party. Vice News' Michael Moynihan spent time with Beck on his ranch to talk about conservatism, Donal...

One of the revelations in the Podesta email leak from Wikileaks today is that when Donna Brazile was still at CNN this year––before becoming interim DNC

There has been a lot of speculation about possible cooperation between Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the State Department over the disclosure of her emails

One supporter being paid to create multiple anonymous accounts does not constitute genuine support for Hillary Clinton.

In leaked audio from a campaign event in New York, Hillary Clinton says the Supreme Court of the United States got it wrong on the Second Amendment.

“Our very weak and ineffective leader, Paul Ryan, had a bad conference call where his members went wild at his disloyalty.”

FRENCH police chiefs have been heavily criticised for sending officers into gang-ridden "no-go zones" after two officers were seriously injured in a petrol bomb attack this weekend.

Regarding Donald Trump’s private sexual comments: We are living through a national hysteria. To understand how and why, it is necessary to understand the indispensable role hysteria plays on the left. The Left is always in major crisis mode. And in nearly every case, the crisis is wildly exaggerated or simply false — in other words, hysteria. For example: Few people deny that the earth is warming. To assert that is not hysteria. What is hysteria is the Left’s position that carbon emissions will destroy life on Earth. No one denies that there are racist cops. What is hysteria is the Left’s claim that innocent blacks are routinely shot to death by racist cops. The widespread protests against the name Washington “Redskins” were pure left-wing hysteria — ended only by the revelation through polling that the vast majority of American Indians couldn’t care less about the name. The examples are endless: from the alleged epidemic of heterosexual AIDS in America and preschool molestation scares in the ’80s to the wildly exaggerated dangers of secondhand smoke and the baseless fears about electronic cigarettes. We are regularly forced to endure a new left-wing-manufactured, media-supercharged hysteria. The latest is the tsunami of horror in reaction to Donald Trump’s gross and juvenile comments made in private eleven years ago. The tsunami of condemnation of his remarks is quintessential left-wing hysteria. That more than a few Republicans and conservatives have joined the hysteria is a testament to the power of mass media and hysteria to influence normally sensible people. This is hysteria first and foremost because the comments were made in private. I would say the same thing if crass comments made by Hillary Clinton in private conversation had been recorded. In fact, I did. In 2000, in a Wall Street Journal column, I defended Hillary Clinton against charges that she was an anti-Semite. That year, it was reported that Clinton had called Paul Fray, the manager of her husband’s failed 1974 congressional campaign, a “f***ing Jew bastard.” Even the left-wing newspaper the Guardian reported that three people — two witnesses and Mr. Fray — confirmed the report. Nevertheless, I wrote in the Journal, “I wish to defend Mrs. Clinton. I do so as a practicing Jew and a Republican. . . . We must cease this moral idiocy of judging people by stray private comments.” I gave two more examples: One was Harry Truman, who often used the word “kike” when referring to Jews. Yet he was the Jews’ greatest friend when he changed Jewish history by resisting powerful State Department opposition and recognized the State of Israel. The other was Richard Nixon, who made anti-Jewish remarks in private conversations in the Oval Office. These were revealed on tapes he himself made of his conversations, and he was accordingly widely labeled an anti-Semite. Yet, as president, Nixon appointed the first American Jewish secretary of state and, more important, literally saved Israel’s life with his quick airlift of military supplies during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. If Hillary wins, will conservatives who gave up on Trump really think that it was worth having a left-wing Supreme Court? As I concluded: “It is highly misleading to probe private comments for evidence of anti-Semitism, racism, bigotry, and sexism.” In addition to not taking all private comments seriously, Republicans, conservatives, and independents need to ask themselves whether what Trump said — not did, but said – in a private conversation is any way comparable to the truly awful things Hillary Clinton and her husband have done both to women and to the country. They also need to ask themselves whether it is worth giving the Left the White House over such trivia. If Hillary Clinton wins, will Republicans and conservatives who gave up on Trump because of this recording really think that it was worth having a left-wing Supreme Court for the next 30 years; having left-wing judges completely dominate lower federal courts; radically curtailing religious liberty in America; having speech codes go from colleges to the society as a whole; massively increasing the size of the government and of the debt; bringing in tens of thousands of refugees from the Arab Middle East; and having open borders — all because of this recording? How can anyone answer in the affirmative? The answer is the left-wing hysteria got to them. On the same day the recording came out, so did leaked e-mails that revealed that Hillary Clinton told a Brazilian bank in 2013 that she is for “open borders.” Open borders mean the end of the United States as we know it. That, my fellow Americans, is worth getting hysterical about. — Dennis Prager is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and columnist. His latest book, The Ten Commandments: Still the Best Moral Code, was published by Regnery. He is the founder of Prager University and may be contacted at dennisprager.com. © 2016 Creators.com

Leaked comments by Hillary Clinton in speeches made to Wall Street banks and major corporations reveal that Clinton was in fact quite cozy with the people she supposedly reviled.

The UK’s public prosecutor has demanded social media users who post “photoshopped" images and memes should face jail.

10,000 Supporters at Pennsylvania Trump Rally Chant 'CNN Sucks'

“It is so nice that the shackles have been taken off me and I can now fight for America the way I want to.”

The speaker’s decision to all but withdraw his endorsement of Trump was perhaps the most damaging fallout from the Republican ticket’s latest controversy.

If you like your plan.....Nevermind!

Students at the University of Wisconsin-Madison have rolled out the sale of hoodies with the slogan "All White People Are Racist."

Hillary Clinton ended up helping Donald Trump repair some of the damage from his lewd comments about women this weekend when she ran hard left on the Supreme Court — reinforcing the one overriding reason conservative Republicans have for voting for their flawed presidential nominee.

A wheelchair-bound woman was gang raped by six asylum seekers, Swedish police have said.

The final con is upon us. Donald Trump has finally decided to unleash a two-pronged strategy as the world burns around him. A new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll shows Trump down a whopping 11 points – and that’s the only poll taken completely after Trump’s 2005 “grab ‘em by the p***y” tape dropped. There are no state polls out yet. But the indicators are brutal. And Congressional polls are starting to tank for Republicans, too.

Hillary - the women's rights champion - defended a child molester who raped a 12-year-old girl, then laughed about knowing he was guilty. Thanks to 'placeboi...

Share Tweet Pin Plus LinkedIn Reddit StumbleUpon Digg Email Print A profession is only as good as its commitment to integrity and code of ethics. I didn?t major in journalism. If I had, I would like to think that at some point in the process at least one of my professors would have talked about the need to maintain professionalism. If our news media outlets are to be taken seriously, they need to live up to a certain standard of impartiality and distinguish between what is fact and what is opinion and what is news and what constitutes vindictiveness. Further, the Press should report on the news, not create it. In this election the media has completely dropped all pretense of impartiality. During the days of the Soviet Union, Pravda was the only source of news. Since it was controlled by the government, it was merely another form of propaganda. No one can take a state-controlled newspaper as a legitimate source of news. In the United States we have always had ?freedom of the Press? and the right to free speech under the First Amendment. Free speech is the very cornerstone of a free people. The Constitution defines government and addresses checks and balances. Under ideal conditions the Press should serve as an unofficial check on our leaders in government. Every person should be subjected to the same scrutiny. Regardless of an elected official?s party or ideology the Press should hold them equally accountable. If the Press begins to hold some individuals to a different standard of accountability than another, it is no better than Soviet-controlled Pravda. I submit to you that The Washington Post is no better than Pravda. It has recklessly disregarded basic journalistic standards and has become nothing more than a Clinton propaganda machine. I am simply using the Washington Post as an example. Unfortunately they are the rule, not the exception. Hillary Clinton is treated as though she owns the Press. In the process, the power she is acquiring is dangerous. The First Amendment is sacred and if it is abused, we risk losing it. To give a single individual or group of individuals complete support, ignoring any flaws they may have, creates a situation where that person no longer feels accountable. If they have the Press to support that notion, the begin to accrue dangerous levels of power. The end result? If history teaches us anything, it?s that those who acquire too much power, are loathe to give it up. Voluntary submission will ultimately become forced submission. If you have the capacity to think for yourself, it is apparent that this is garbage journalism. I think The National Enquirer has higher journalistic standards. This article is deplorable. Think about it: This writer had to have pitched this idea to an editor: ?I?m going to find a person with mental issues, and then I?m going to describe how much they adore Donald Trump. The obvious connection is that you would have to be insane to support him.? You?d think the editor would respond with outrage at such a disgusting premise and say ?We are The Washington Post we are above that.? Obviously the editor must have said ?Great idea! Go with it!? The Post also ran another story which, if you were to believe it, Trump fell apart at a rally and started rambling incoherently. Please watch the actual video of his address. I found his speech to be completely coherent, logical, and even inspiring. Of course I am insane by The Washington Post?s standards. Finally, the Post published another article, perhaps the most reckless of all three. It is essentially an op-ed run under the guise of legitimate news. Let me dissect what it says/implies: Trump is a tax evader. No he isn?t. Does anyone go to their tax preparer during tax season and say ?Please maximize the amount of taxes I have to pay!? If there was a way they could lock him up, I?m sure they would have don it already. There is a difference between taking advantage of tax law and tax evasion. To his credit Trump has been very calm in discussing his repeated tax audits by the IRS. To his credit he hasn?t pointed out that using the IRS to attack an opponent is a classic political trick. Trump had a shaky debate performance. Given his mic was defective, given he was interrupted over 40 times to Hillary?s 6, and given she probably had an earpiece, I?d say Trump did extraordinarily well. Plus, his performance is a subjective measure, not a factual statement. Trump is dropping in the polls. The ?polls? are a joke and have been criticized by many as being rigged to create the false impression Trump is actually behind when he isn?t. He is feuding with a Latina beauty queen. No. he is simply responding to a cheap shot by Hillary during the debate. His tweets imply mental instability because he tweets at all hours. That tells me he is thinking about nothing else other than this election. He is serious. Other illogical assertions in the article is that Trump is self-imploding, doesn?t really want to be President, and is a loser. What? Am I to believe he has suddenly collapsed into a pathetic heap foaming out the mouth and ranting like a madman? If only Hillary Clinton were subjected to equal scrutiny. If only? Donald Trump is essentially carrying on a campaign under the most hostile circumstances ever faced by any American Presidential candidate. Instead of giving up or going away quietly he continues to speak his mind and fight on. No one can take that away from him. Has it ever occurred to the Press he might actually be a man of courage and conviction? The more they attack him, the more he holds his ground, the more he proves his case. Share Tweet Pin Plus LinkedIn Reddit StumbleUpon Digg Email Print

In this new video released by Project Veritas, James O’Keefe exposes what everyone except Democrats have known to be true. There is a lot of voter fraud. In ...