#350051
Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet.
loading
#350052
"Managing Microaggressions" is the latest event to hit the University of Virginia, where students can learn how not to poke fun at people's food or clothing choices and can share the most traumatic human rights abuses they've experienced on campus.   Among the worst microagressions one can experience, according to students, is simply being "American."  
loading
#350053
Conservative author Brad Thor and Donald Trump supporter David Wohl got in a fierce battle on Fox News tonight over Thor’s Facebook post yesterday saying he ...
loading
#350054
'We have a busy weekend planned,' one GOP operative says as big delegate selection opens.
loading
#350055
This semester, YAF asked a variety of students at George Washington University one simple question: Do you believe America is exceptional? FULL STORY: http:/...
loading
#350056
A new Pew poll shows that Trump supporters are the true conservatives of the Republican party. Trump supporters want a ...
loading
#350057

Venezuela Is Falling Apart

Submitted 8 years ago by ActRight Community

Scenes from daily life in a failing state
loading
#350058

Trump, Now What?

Submitted 8 years ago by ActRight Community

We should put ALL our energy behind defeating Clinton, but one doesn’t have to be “for Trump” in order to seek every vote we can muster “against Clinton.”
loading
#350059
There's a lot to be learned from the documents the presumptive GOP nominee won't disclose.
loading
#350060
Regulations: Here’s a headline that should scare anyone who has been following ObamaCare: “As time runs out, the Obama administration races to reshape health care.” Hasn’t it done enough damage res…
loading
#350061
Tonight, unopposed presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump still managed to lose almost half the votes cast in...
loading
#350062
'My main job is to keep my job, to get reelected. It takes precedence over everything,' an anonymous member of Congress writes in a new book set for May 24 release by a Minnesota publisher.
loading
#350063
In the national TV-news world, only Fox News reported that Obama national-security communications whiz Ben Rhodes told The New York Times he created an “echo chamber” with a compliant national media to promote the Iran arms deal, even misleading the public as to when those talks began. They actually began in July 2012, but the administration claimed it began after “moderate” Hassan Rouhani’s election in June 2013. The same pattern happened after Fox diplomatic correspondent James Rosen reported that the State Department edited out an on-camera admission by Psaki in 2013 that it was necessary for the Obama administration to lie to reporters about negotating with Iran, since “diplomacy requires privacy to progress.”
loading
#350064
A national poll reveals that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is viewed less favorably than lice, root canals, DMV and Nickelback.
loading
#350065
On Thursday the 200-year-old Cambridge Union Society debated the motion: "This House Believes Masculinity is Damaging To Everyone". Here's what panelist and Clinical Psychologist, Martin Seager, had to say about that.
loading
#350066
"Portland State University students stage a walk out and protest against the arming of campus police on Tuesday. They ranted against capitalism, patriarchy, ...
loading
#350067
Weekly jobless claims rose by 20,000 to 294,000 last week. That came in higher than the estimate for 270,000. The prior week was unchanged at 274,000.
loading
#350068
A popular knock on voters who support Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders because they have been “left behind” by free trade, globalization and technological progress is that they want a handout from Un…
loading
#350069
If Trump won’t release his taxes, his convention delegates should abstain on the first ballot, driving him below 1,237.
loading
#350070
Democratic leaders went into damage-control mode Wednesday, insisting the party won’t be splintered by Bernie Sanders’ relentless leftist campaign against Hillary Clinton. A day after Sanders troun…
loading
#350071
Democrats say Universal Background Checks Not Enough, Demand Confiscation!
loading
#350072
Support for, or opposition to, mass immigration is apparently a class issue, not an ethnic or racial issue. Elites more often support lenient immigration policies; the general public typically opposes them. At the top of the list are Mexico’s elites. Illegal immigration results in an estimated $25 billion sent back in remittances to Mexico each year. The Mexican government worries more about remittances, the country’s No. 1 source of foreign exchange, than it does about its low-paid citizens who are in the U.S., scrimping to send money back home. Remittances also excuse the Mexican government from restructuring the economy or budgeting for anti-poverty programs. #ad#Mexico sees the U.S. the way 19th-century elites in this country saw the American frontier: as a valuable escape hatch for the discontented and unhappy, who could flee rather than stay home and demand long-needed changes. American employers in a number of industries — construction, manufacturing, hospitality, and others — have long favored illegal immigration. Low-wage labor cuts costs: The larger the pool of undocumented immigrants, the less pressure to raise wages. That was why Cesar Chavez’s United Farm Workers in the 1970s occasionally patrolled the southern border in its vigilante-style “illegals campaign” to keep out undocumented immigrants while opposing guest-worker programs. RELATED: Trump’s Immigration Disaster Moreover, the additional social expense associated with millions of undocumented workers — in rising health-care, legal, education, and law-enforcement costs — is usually picked up by the public taxpayer, not by employers. Ethnic elites also favor lax immigration policies. For all the caricatures of the old melting pot, millions of legal immigrants still rapidly assimilate, integrate, and intermarry. Often within two generations of arrival, they blend indistinguishably into the general population and drop their hyphenated and accented nomenclature. But when immigration is mostly illegal, in great numbers, and without ethnic diversity, assimilation stalls. Instead, a near-permanent pool of undocumented migrants offers a political opportunity for activists to provide them with collective representation. Elites have ways of navigating around the downsides of illegal immigration. If the borders were closed to illegal immigration, then being Hispanic would soon be analogous to being Italian-, Greek-, or Portuguese-American in terms of having little prognostic value in predicting one’s political outlook. The continual flow of indigent new arrivals distorts statistics on poverty and parity, prompting ethnic elites in politics, journalism, and higher education to seek redress for perennial income and cultural imbalances. Offering affirmative action to a third-generation Hispanic American who does not speak Spanish apparently is seen as one way to help thousands of recently arrived impoverished immigrants from Oaxaca, Mexico, find parity. #share#High-income American elites likewise have largely favored illegal immigration for a variety of predicable reasons. The professional class likes having low-wage “help” to clean the house, cook meals, help take care of kids and elders, and tend the lawn. Such outsourcing usually is not affordable for the middle and lower classes. Elites have ways of navigating around the downsides of illegal immigration. They can avoid crowded schools and low-income neighborhoods, and they can easily pay the higher taxes that can result from illegal immigration. RELATED: NR Explainer: The Supreme Court Challenge to Executive Amnesty Support for lax immigration policies also offers psychological penance for essentially living a life of apartheid. An elite can avoid living in integrated neighborhoods or sending his children to diverse schools, but he can square that circle by voicing theoretical support for immigrant amnesty and sanctuary cities. We see such hypocrisy from proponents of loosened immigration policies such as Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Univision personality Jorge Ramos, and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. #related#Who does not benefit from mass illegal immigration? Mostly the poor, minorities, and the lower-middle class. They are not employers, but rather compete with undocumented immigrants for low-wage jobs. They usually clean their own houses and do their own yardwork. They cannot afford to send their children to a different school when theirs becomes overcrowded. They cannot afford the increased taxes needed for social support of millions of new arrivals. Donald Trump tried to demagogue illegal immigration along ethnic lines. But the issue is not where illegal immigrants come from or who they are, but rather their effect on the struggling working classes already here, comprising all ethnic and racial backgrounds. Prune away the rhetoric and the issue becomes simple: Elites profit from high-volume illegal immigration, while most other U.S. citizens support immigration only when it is legal, measured, and diverse. — Victor Davis Hanson is a classicist and historian at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, and the author, most recently, of The Savior Generals. You can reach him by e-mailing [email protected]. © 2016 Tribune Media Services, Inc.
loading
#350073
The farmer leased his land for fracking purposes. Emma Thompson and her Greenpeace friends decided t
loading
#350074
Its becoming pretty clear that, like their Democrat forefathers, todays Democrats are convinced that America is entirely too free and that they must take their blue states and secede.
loading
#350075
We're still safer than were were 20 years ago...
loading