ActRight

Part of Hillary Clinton’s support in Miami-Dade County comes from an unlikely source: Republican voters.

"A paid army of 'former reporters, bloggers'," et al.

In addition to suppressing conservative news sources, Facebook artificially promotes stories about the Black Lives Matter movement.

Governor Pat McCrory has asked courts to determine whether or not the state’s controversial “bathroom law” violates the Civil Rights Act, as the U.S. Department of Justice contends.

In a September 2, 1987, interview with CNN's Larry King, Donald Trump says he has no interest in being president and explains why he took out an ad ripping t...

If everyone has a gun No one has a gun - Sudden Clarity Clarence

State Dept. can't find any emails for Bryan Pagliano, Clinton's top IT staffer.

Billionaire GOP Donor: 'Very Disappointed' In GOPers Like Ryan Not Supporting Trump, Trump'll 'Moderate A Lot of His Views'

Why bother to complain when political and economic turmoil have become a way of life?

At least two programs on MSNBC Monday referred to former president Bill Clinton's well-documented past philandering as "alleged" in response Donald Trump ripping into Queen Hillary last weekend for backing up her husband.  "She was a total enabler," said Trump over the weekend. "She would go after these women and destroy their lives. I mean have you ever read what Hillary Clinton did to the women that Bill Clinton had affairs with? And they're going after me with women? Give me a break"

Share Tweet Pin Plus LinkedIn Reddit StumbleUpon Digg Email Print When you look at the freedoms enumerated to us under the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution, it?s interesting to note not just what they are but the order in which they are listed. It gives you a glimpse into the priorities and thought processes of the Founding Fathers. After numbers one and two, which we?ll discuss in a moment, we have the Third Amendment. If you don?t know offhand what it is, don?t feel bad – most people don?t. It?s actually an explicit prohibition on the government forcing private citizens to let soldiers stay in their home without consent, which (thankfully) isn?t an issue that comes up in modern times. But if we take a moment to imagine that it does, envisioning a world in which the federal or a state government might well order us to open our homes to armed strangers (even heroic strangers, as those serving in the military), we can begin to understand why it was so essential to the Founders that we be protected from this practice. Rights that come later, such as due process, legal representation, and immunity from self-incrimination, are important too, but I?m forced to agree that security in my home – which is also discussed more generally in the very next entry, the Fourth Amendment – trumps them. Then we have the First Amendment, which everyone knows guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of religion. These are the very cornerstones of American society, so again, I concur: They?re the most important considerations of all and deserve their place. But of everything else, of all the important rights that the Founders could have given a spot second only to the foundation of our civilization itself, they chose the right to keep and bear arms. That?s why it?s so disturbing to me as a woman that, seemingly forever, this essential right has been under attack. And I?m very sorry to say that of all states in the Union, the people responsible for this attack have enjoyed some of their greatest successes in California. Our gun rights in this state have been severely eroded, and in April it got even worse. In a legislative push that the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has labeled “GunMeggedon”, a wave of ten gun control bills were proposed, eight of which have already received a passing first vote out of committee. Some of these bills are downright draconian, likes the one that limits clip sizes, the one that extends the statute of limitations on non-violent (and I repeat, non-violent) gun crimes, and – worst of all – the one that bans semi-automatic weapons and requires registration of those currently owned. We also have more benign-seeming offerings, like funding for “gun violence research” and the beginnings of mandatory ammunition tracking, but there?s no reason these wouldn?t do what anti-gun legislation has always done, which is to set a precedent upon which gun grabbers can simply build in the future. The FPC has warned that with all this new legislation under consideration, California is reaching a “point of no return” in its seemingly inexorable slip into deeper and deeper gun control. I think that should frighten and offend any honest American citizen greatly. When the government tries to restrict or take away your guns, it is effectively saying that you cannot be trusted with them. Never mind that you are a law-abiding citizen who only wants to exercise your right to protect or provide for your family; as far as they?re concerned, you could be a criminal, so it?s easier just to disarm you. We are not the government?s children, and we do not get our rights from them. Actually, it is they who get their rights from us. Ours come from God, and only He can take them away. The Founding Fathers recognized this, and they chose the right to be armed as representing one of the dearest and most important of all rights with which we are endowed by our Creator. We would do well to recognize their wisdom, and to cherish this sacred right. That means we must preserve it, and never allow our government to strip us of it. Share Tweet Pin Plus LinkedIn Reddit StumbleUpon Digg Email Print

I almost voted for Bernie Sanders. After all, in important ways his politics are closer to mine than Hillary Clinton’s are, and his campaign for the White House is inspiring.

Kit Daniels, Sizable percentage of Democrats choosing Trump over Clinton. While interviewing residents of a Democratic county, CNN struggled to find a sing

Mizzou was devastated by his hunger strike. See what Jonathan thinks of women, the poor – and crack

They see their plan coming to fruition.

Surreal.

Hmm.

Anonymous contract workers reportedly stated that Facebook censored conservative news content.

Several right-leaning media outlets said they have no clear evidence of the practice, but that they long believed they were being discriminated against

“In a statement to CNN, @marcorubio says he's not interested in being @realDonaldTrump's running mate”

For conservatives, the choice between Clinton & Trump is hard. Neither is a champion of conservative values & the character of each is severely flawed.

RUSH: The solution here might be that the North Carolina governor could say that we don't identify as North Carolina anymore, and therefore your lawsuit against us is irrelevant.

Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES This may be difficult to watch if you’ve never witnessed a curb-stomping before. I was on Reliable Sources yesterday and was somewhat blindside by contributor Kayleigh McEnany who declared I and others who would not support Trump were not conservative. She even went on to question where I had been in previous fights, a question she might want to | Read More »

Donald Trump declared Monday the U.S. never has to default on debt "because you print the money," while trying to clarify his strategy for managing the national debt.

During a "Managing Microaggressions" event last Monday at the University of Virginia, students spoke out against microaggressions like identifying as “American” and criticizing someone’s taste in food.