#332651
Republicans hope to repeal much of the Affordable Care Act through budget reconciliation, an expedited process that has produced some of the nation’s most important laws.
loading
#332652
Wikileaks is offering cash to anyone who catches the outgoing Obama administration destroying public records. The group tweeted its offer on Tuesday night. We are issuing a US$20,000 reward for information leading to the arrest or exposure of any Obama admin agent destroying significant records. pic.twitter.com/kRRP246uGo — WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 4, 2017 “We are issuing …
loading
#332653
PRESIDENT Obama has deployed US special forces troops along Lithuania’s border with ?aggressive? Russia. Tensions between Washington and the Kremlin have reached Cold War levels amid re…
loading
#332654
The state’s Democratic-led Legislature decided to retain Mr. Holder to represent it in any legal fights against the new Republican White House.
loading
#332655
The socially aware network’s current and recent hosts have some serious tax problems.
loading
#332656
SWEDISH police have admitted the city of Malmo, which was been described as a “battlefield”, is not safe as they failed to stop thugs from sending fireworks into the crowd on New Year’s Eve.
loading
#332657
"The Clinton days are over."
loading
#332658

Bill Nye Saves the World | REACTION

Submitted 8 years ago by ActRight Community

Here is my reaction/response to Bill Nye's Saves the World INTRO
loading
#332659
What is the purpose of immigration?
loading
#332660
More than 40 years after the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision, 69% of Americans say the historic ruling should not be completely overturned.
loading
#332661
You would think that the NAACP would study some history before they decide to malign someone, but no; the NAACP and the Alabama NAACP are occupying the Mobile, Alabama office of Senator Jeff Sessions, Donald Trump’s choice for Attorney General, ”until he withdraws as AG nominee.”
loading
#332662
I was hoping to write an upbeat column to kick off the new year, something about how all sorts of things in our great country are bound to get better in the months ahead, a column based at least as...
loading
#332663
Fascinating interview with the founder and editor of Wikileaks
loading
#332664
House Speaker Paul Ryan vowed Tuesday to deliver results for voters who handed control of Washington to his party in the November election, as he easily won re-election to the top congressional post at the opening of the 115th Congress.
loading
#332665
National Geographic is 'promoting a political agenda over science and the wellbeing of innocent children.'
loading
#332666
The legislation would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
loading
#332667
Via the front page of the Washington Post website comes the “news” that more than 1,100 law professors signed their names to a letter urging the Senate to reject Jeff Sessions’s nomination for attorney general. I’m sorry, but the cost of relentless academic partisanship is academic credibility. Is it “news” that leftists don’t like a conservative nominee? Perhaps if law schools were known for scrupulous nonpartisan hiring practices and balanced presentations of ideological issues, the letter would be compelling. But they’re not, and it’s not.  Here’s the body of the professors’ letter, in full: We are 1140 faculty members from 170 different law schools in 48 states across the country. We urge you to reject the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions for the position of Attorney General of the United States. In 1986, the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee, in a bipartisan vote, rejected President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of then-U.S. Attorney Sessions for a federal judgeship, due to statements Sessions had made that reflected prejudice against African Americans. Nothing in Senator Sessions’ public life since 1986 has convinced us that he is a different man than the 39-year-old attorney who was deemed too racially insensitive to be a federal district court judge. Some of us have concerns about his misguided prosecution of three civil rights activists for voter fraud in Alabama in 1985, and his consistent promotion of the myth of voter-impersonation fraud. Some of us have concerns about his support for building a wall along our country’s southern border. Some of us have concerns about his robust support for regressive drug policies that have fueled mass incarceration. Some of us have concerns about his questioning of the relationship between fossil fuels and climate change. Some of us have concerns about his repeated opposition to legislative efforts to promote the rights of women and members of the LGBTQ community. Some of us share all of these concerns. All of us believe it is unacceptable for someone with Senator Sessions’ record to lead the Department of Justice. The Attorney General is the top law enforcement officer in the United States, with broad jurisdiction and prosecutorial discretion, which means that, if confirmed, Jeff Sessions would be responsible for the enforcement of the nation’s civil rights, voting, immigration, environmental, employment, national security, surveillance, antitrust, and housing laws. As law faculty who work every day to better understand the law and teach it to our students, we are convinced that Jeff Sessions will not fairly enforce our nation’s laws and promote justice and equality in the United States. We urge you to reject his nomination. This isn’t an argument, it’s a regurgitation of Huffington Post headlines, and (shamefully, given that this is a law professors’ letter) they don’t even have the decency to note that Sessions’ vigorously disputes allegations of his racism, including allegations that he made racist statements.   Also, I’m curious — given that the letter touches on everything from climate change to immigration policy, what exactly are the scientific, economic, and national security credentials of the signatories? Can they speak to the impact of immigration on working-class wages? Are they authorities on the precise relationship between fossil fuels and climate, including on the relative effectiveness of Obama-era EPA actions? And if there are actual examples of in-person voter fraud, is it still a “myth?” What’s actually happening is that a collection of liberals are using the (rapidly-diminishing) prestige of their institutions and profession to make news when there is none. Of course liberals oppose a conservative nominee, and of course academic liberals are prone to play the race card. If any of them wish to make a detailed case based on law and facts, then make that case. Until then, however, their letter is little more than an especially pretentious version of a Change.org petition.  
loading
#332668
If you believe liberal writers and pundits apocalyptic post-election musings, “Donald Trump’s America” is no place to raise a child. The latest of these was in Elle magazine last week. Titled “I’m …
loading
#332669
LIVE: THE WAYNE DUPREE PROGRAM 1/3/2017
loading
#332670
Colorado was among the four states where voters approved a minimum wage hike in November.
loading
#332671
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin hearings on Sessions' nomination Jan. 10, with many civil rights groups standing in opposition.
loading
#332672
Most gender and women’s studies programs preach to the converted and lack courses that would appeal to men -- or, for that matter, women who don’t have particular political leanings, argues Hallie Lieberman.
loading
#332673
The U.S. circuit judge was nominated by President Obama to fill the late Antonin Scalia’s high-court seat 9½ months ago.
loading
#332674
#332675
Critics who thought the U.S. opened the UN’s anti-Israel floodgates by abstaining on a vote condemning settlements last week say an obscure subsequent move by the world body to establish a “blacklist” of Israeli companies proved them right.
loading