#352526
Ted Cruz gave a great speech in Philadelphia just a few minutes ago on uniting the party and restoring America. Cruz said that we are at a point of choosing and pointed out that first we must unite…
loading
#352527
In an interview with Fox News last night, pro-life Republican presidential candidate Ted Ceuz said Hillary Clinton has a radical pro-abortion position that supp
loading
#352528
In the night’s most unsurprising finish, Donald Trump cleaned up in New York, clocking both Ohio Governor John Kasich and Texas Senator Ted Cruz. The Smartest, Toughest People In The World™ voted overwhelmingly for a loudmouth braggart liar con man who whines about how mean Ted Cruz is to New Yorkers for suggesting they are leftists who vote for loudmouth braggart liar con men. Naturally, the media declared the Republican nomination race over. Again. Here are five lessons going forward.
loading
#352529
A mom is now in trouble on Facebook for dropping a major logic bomb on the transgender bathrooms issue. All she did was dress up as Russell Wilson, a Mexican
loading
#352530
Liberals, Climate Change and the Coming “Doomsday”
loading
#352531
An anonymous University of North Carolina (UNC) student slandered her school’s College Republicans (CR) with a series of apparently fake posts on Reddit, later denounced by members of the organization.
loading
#352532
Transparent is a comedic television series that explores the life of Mort, played by Jeffrey Tambor, who comes out to his family late in life as transgender. While the show's executives might be pushing a political agenda, it seems at least some members of the production crew are not. 
loading
#352533
Toronto Star publisher: Segment of Canadian media peddling “flat-out racism & bigotry” against Muslims in Canada
loading
#352534
The annual White Privilege Conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was apparently too white for the attendees.
loading
#352535
The baseball analyst known for strong conservative views has since deleted the post and offered an explanation of sorts.
loading
#352536
MSNBC national correspondent Joy Reid was a panelist in the final hour of the network’s New York primary coverage in the midnight eastern hour Wednesday and astonishingly tried to claim that Hillary Clinton has had to “run essentially for the last 20 years against” the media’s “tide” of negative coverage.
loading
#352537
As for New York, the state actually voting Tuesday night, he said only, “God bless New York and God bless the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.”
loading
#352538
During an interview on CNN Tuesday, Former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, a campaign surrogate for Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz, called out host John Berman for showing a "bias" that is "naked to everyone watching." The discussion began when Berman's CNN co-host Kate Boldaun asked Cuccinelli about...
loading
#352539
Rand Paul Pushes Bill to Block Obama's Social Security Gun Ban
loading
#352540
Two Republican leaders in Congress declined Tuesday to embrace a bill moving through the Senate that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia.
loading
#352541
Learn more about Ted Cruz: www.tedcruz.org Follow Ted: twitter.com/tedcruz Like Ted: fb.com/tedcruzpage Ted’s Instagram: instragram.com/cruzforpresident Dona...
loading
#352542

How Bernie lost New York

Submitted 8 years ago by ActRight Community

Caught up in one distraction after another, Sanders never came close to the upset victory he once predicted.
loading
#352543
IT WAS A SHELLACKING – A ROUT! CNN reported Donald Trump will win 90+ delegates in New York state in ...
loading
#352544
Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet.
loading
#352545
Bill Kristol – Founder and Editor of The Weekly Standard and ABC News Contributor – joined Steve Malzberg on Newsmax ...
loading
#352546
Photo by Pabak Sarkar/Flickr “Just Google it,” is the simple answer to so many questions for today’s tech-savvy millennial. While beneficial, having the whole Internet world at our fingertips has also eliminated the need to ask the people we actually know for explanations and advice. This has...
loading
#352547
A Methodist bishop whose church receives millions of dollars in federal grants each year to house unaccompanied alien children asserted in a House hearing on Tuesday that the U.S. has "raped" immigran
loading
#352548
This story will update throughout the evening as New York's returns and reaction roll in. PHILADELPHIA – Eager to shrug off a rough night in New York, Sen. Ted Cruz?
loading
#352549
"All white people owe reparations. If you don't give it, we coming to take it."
loading
#352550
Our nation’s centuries-old commitment to free speech and religious liberty was already under threat. But it took men wanting to use women’s bathrooms and vice versa for the Left to truly show its hand, plainly and unequivocally declaring that American legal traditions should be set ablaze. Yesterday, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights published a “Statement Condemning Recent State Laws and Pending Proposals Targeting the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Community” — a statement motivated by new Mississippi laws protecting religious freedom and by North Carolina’s much-discussed “bathroom law.” The Commission claims that any law requiring men and women to use bathrooms that correspond to their biological sex “jeopardizes not only the dignity, but also the actual physical safety, of transgender people whose appearances may not match societal expectations of the sex specified on their identification documents.” #ad#While this is standard leftist rhetoric — notice it omits any concern for women and girls who will be exposed to male nudity and could be rendered more vulnerable to sexual predators — what follows is perhaps the clearest and most unequivocal statement of radical progressive legal philosophy I’ve ever read. It articulates three principles that, taken together, would render religious liberty permanently subordinate to the interests and demands of LGBT activists: Civil rights protections ensuring nondiscrimination, as embodied in the Constitution, laws, and policies, are of preeminent importance in American jurisprudence. Religious exemptions to the protections of civil rights based upon classifications such as race, color, national origin, sex, disability status, sexual orientation, and gender identity, when they are permissible, significantly infringe upon these civil rights. Overly broad religious exemptions unduly burden nondiscrimination laws and policies. Federal and state courts, lawmakers, and policy-makers at every level must tailor religious exceptions to civil liberties and civil rights protections as narrowly as applicable law requires. The first bullet point is breathtaking in scope, taking the concept of “nondiscrimination” and establishing it as a form of super law, in a “preeminent” jurisprudential position above even the enumerated liberties of the First Amendment. #share#The next point makes the preposterous claim that religious liberty “significantly” infringes on civil rights. Such a contention is only credible if the commission would concoct a “civil right” to force a Christian baker to help celebrate a gay wedding, or if a “civil right” for a gay couple to work with Christian adoption agencies, or a “civil right” for a lesbian woman to lead a Christian organization. EDITORIAL: Capitulation on Religious-Liberty Laws Is Shameful and Shortsighted None of these alleged civil rights have previously existed in American law. Instead, they represent coercion, pure and simple — the destruction of the civil rights of the faithful for the sake of the convenience of the radicals. After all, not one of these despised religious exemptions actually deprives an LGBT person of the right to marry or adopt or form their own religious organization. The last bullet is the final twist of the knife. Since our nation’s founding, religious freedom has been deemed so vital to the health of our democracy that lawmakers and judges have often attempted to make sure that state actions are “narrowly tailored” when those actions conflict with religious freedom. Now the Left wants liberty to be narrowly tailored when it conflicts with the new nondiscrimination regime. #related#In the Commission’s eyes, there is no true accommodation of religion, because religion is merely an “excuse” for discrimination. Thus, there is no value in attempting to build a society where religious believers can live with integrity and — yes — “dignity” alongside sexual revolutionaries. But accommodation and mutual respect have never been the revolutionaries’ aim. Their goal is clear and explicit: to equate sincere religious objections to sexual immorality with the invidious discrimination of Jim Crow, and then to banish believers to the same margins of society currently occupied by white supremacists. Indeed, Commission chairman Martin Castro says as much, comparing religious-freedom laws to efforts to “block racial integration,” which, of course, have “no place in our society.” The Commission has issued a declaration of war — not just on religious liberty but also on the First Amendment writ large. After all, if the new religion of nondiscrimination is now legally “preeminent,” then every other civil liberty can be cast aside in the name of ending “transphobia.” Four centuries of American legal and cultural tradition are thus rendered less important than the “dignity” of those who demand mixed-gender bathrooms. — David French is an attorney, and a staff writer at National Review.
loading