#332676
The legislation would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
loading
#332677
LIVE: THE WAYNE DUPREE PROGRAM 1/3/2017
loading
#332678
It's hard to believe how heroic Desmond Doss was. So hard, 'Hacksaw Ridge' director Mel Gibson and producers left some of it out.
loading
#332679
In a wide-ranging request for documents and analysis, President-elect Donald Trump's transition team asked the Department of Homeland Security last month to assess all assets available for border wall and barrier construction.
loading
#332680
Follow international news through our Observers' amateur images and eyewitness testimony. All the content is verified and explained by our journalists.
loading
#332681
In the past month or so, there have been three embarrassing and major corrections on three separate pieces from The Washington Post, all of which...
loading
#332682
#332683
The thing about computer hacking is that it's such a general, far-reaching term that it's almost impossible to explain to someone who isn't already familiar with it. So, news networks who need b-roll footage to show while they're talking about hacking usually just show keyboards or random
loading
#332684
They doubt they can reach the finish line this year, but advocates pushing for a new constitutional convention convened by the states say 2017 could still be an important year in building momentum, after major GOP gains in the elections left them with even more ripe target among state legislatures.
loading
#332685
Via the front page of the Washington Post website comes the “news” that more than 1,100 law professors signed their names to a letter urging the Senate to reject Jeff Sessions’s nomination for attorney general. I’m sorry, but the cost of relentless academic partisanship is academic credibility. Is it “news” that leftists don’t like a conservative nominee? Perhaps if law schools were known for scrupulous nonpartisan hiring practices and balanced presentations of ideological issues, the letter would be compelling. But they’re not, and it’s not.  Here’s the body of the professors’ letter, in full: We are 1140 faculty members from 170 different law schools in 48 states across the country. We urge you to reject the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions for the position of Attorney General of the United States. In 1986, the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee, in a bipartisan vote, rejected President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of then-U.S. Attorney Sessions for a federal judgeship, due to statements Sessions had made that reflected prejudice against African Americans. Nothing in Senator Sessions’ public life since 1986 has convinced us that he is a different man than the 39-year-old attorney who was deemed too racially insensitive to be a federal district court judge. Some of us have concerns about his misguided prosecution of three civil rights activists for voter fraud in Alabama in 1985, and his consistent promotion of the myth of voter-impersonation fraud. Some of us have concerns about his support for building a wall along our country’s southern border. Some of us have concerns about his robust support for regressive drug policies that have fueled mass incarceration. Some of us have concerns about his questioning of the relationship between fossil fuels and climate change. Some of us have concerns about his repeated opposition to legislative efforts to promote the rights of women and members of the LGBTQ community. Some of us share all of these concerns. All of us believe it is unacceptable for someone with Senator Sessions’ record to lead the Department of Justice. The Attorney General is the top law enforcement officer in the United States, with broad jurisdiction and prosecutorial discretion, which means that, if confirmed, Jeff Sessions would be responsible for the enforcement of the nation’s civil rights, voting, immigration, environmental, employment, national security, surveillance, antitrust, and housing laws. As law faculty who work every day to better understand the law and teach it to our students, we are convinced that Jeff Sessions will not fairly enforce our nation’s laws and promote justice and equality in the United States. We urge you to reject his nomination. This isn’t an argument, it’s a regurgitation of Huffington Post headlines, and (shamefully, given that this is a law professors’ letter) they don’t even have the decency to note that Sessions’ vigorously disputes allegations of his racism, including allegations that he made racist statements.   Also, I’m curious — given that the letter touches on everything from climate change to immigration policy, what exactly are the scientific, economic, and national security credentials of the signatories? Can they speak to the impact of immigration on working-class wages? Are they authorities on the precise relationship between fossil fuels and climate, including on the relative effectiveness of Obama-era EPA actions? And if there are actual examples of in-person voter fraud, is it still a “myth?” What’s actually happening is that a collection of liberals are using the (rapidly-diminishing) prestige of their institutions and profession to make news when there is none. Of course liberals oppose a conservative nominee, and of course academic liberals are prone to play the race card. If any of them wish to make a detailed case based on law and facts, then make that case. Until then, however, their letter is little more than an especially pretentious version of a Change.org petition.  
loading
#332686
Donald Trump questions why Republicans in Congress have voted to weaken an ethics watchdog.
loading
#332687
Most gender and women’s studies programs preach to the converted and lack courses that would appeal to men -- or, for that matter, women who don’t have particular political leanings, argues Hallie Lieberman.
loading
#332688
The U.S. circuit judge was nominated by President Obama to fill the late Antonin Scalia’s high-court seat 9½ months ago.
loading
#332689
Critics who thought the U.S. opened the UN’s anti-Israel floodgates by abstaining on a vote condemning settlements last week say an obscure subsequent move by the world body to establish a “blacklist” of Israeli companies proved them right.
loading
#332690

The Craziest "Debate"

Submitted 8 years ago by ActRight Community

The craziest debate in the history of the United States.
loading
#332691

Suggestions For Liberals in 2017

Submitted 8 years ago by ActRight Community

Because the Democrat Party continues to implode, I thought it would be helpful to write my third annual Suggestions for Liberals column.
loading
#332692
Cross-dressing a young boy is emotional and psychological child abuse and should be stopped, not celebrated on the cover of National Geographic.
loading
#332693
"It's what we have to live with now," he said.
loading
#332694
China has quietly ushered in a series of new measures aimed at better managing the value of its local currency, the yuan.
loading
#332695
Former President Bill Clinton and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will attend President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration later this month, aides to both Clintons told CNN on Tuesday.
loading
#332696
One issue Fox has is an aging audience. The median age of a Fox prime-time viewer is 68 years old. Should Fox get Tomi Lahren to address this issue?
loading
#332697
“Clinton style politics hasn't been tried by the Democrats since 1996.” Van Jones has declared the Clinton era of politics over. He's right, but I think he is wrong about when it happened. It did not happen with the defeat of Hillary Clinton, but with Al Gore running in 2000. In 2000, if you will recall, Al Gore's team made a conscious decision to sideline Bill Clinton. They were afraid he would taint Gore's campaign because of the Lewinsky matter and impeachment. Never mind that Clinton was popular, Gore not only did not campaign with Clinton, but he also distanced?
loading
#332698
Ford Motor Co (F.N) said Tuesday it will cancel a planned $1.6 billion factory in Mexico and will invest $700 million at a Michigan factory, after President-elect Donald Trump had harshly criticized the Mexico investment plan.
loading
#332699
House Republicans voted Monday night to gut Congress' independent watchdog, the Office of Congressional Ethics, on the eve of a new era.
loading
#332700
House Republicans voted Monday night to gut Congress' independent watchdog, the Office of Congressional Ethics, on the eve of a new era.
loading