ActRight

Islamic State murders 21 Christians, some for violating terms of dhimmi contract Robert Spencer in Front Page: Reza Aslan: Trump Is Popular Because of 'Islamophobia'

California:

Hillary Clinton has attacked opponent Bernie Sanders countless times on the campaign trail over his position on gun control.

By MATTHEW J. DOWD, For The Wall Street JournalMatthew J. Dowd is an independent; chief political analyst for ABC News; and founder of Paradox Capital, a social-impact venture fund. He

The former NAACP leader, who set off a firestorm of criticism last year after it was revealed that she was born white despite having spent decades representing herself as black, says she has no regrets but is “ready to move on.”

Going into the 2016 election cycle, Republicans had a golden opportunity. The House and Senate are already under GOP control; a win in the presidential race would open up the possibility of passing the most ambitious pro-growth agenda since the Reagan landslide in 1980. All that was needed was general consensus within the party on the important features of a governing agenda for the future, and a strong, reform-minded presidential nominee who could ride that agenda to victory in November. In early 2015, this didn’t seem so far-fetched. Now, we know better. #ad#The two leading candidates for the GOP nomination for president — Donald Trump and Senator Ted Cruz — are unlikely to unite the party and set the stage for a successful legislative program next year. Trump has built his campaign around simplistic and populist appeals that resonate with a portion of the electorate but are so disconnected from reality, generally wrong in orientation, and counterproductive as to be useless as guideposts for policy. Cruz has, to some extent, followed suit. A year of this kind of messaging from the top candidates has left the Republican party utterly confused about what it stands for and where it is going. Enter Paul Ryan. When he became speaker of the House late last year, he pledged to push forward a proactive agenda that would give the GOP something to run on in 2016. He is now in the process of making good on that pledge, setting in motion a number of internal task forces charged with developing policy positions in key areas, including health care, taxes, safety-net programs, and national-security policy. All of this has left the New York Times wondering if Ryan is positioning himself as a potential candidate for president should the party convene in Cleveland this summer without a clear nominee. Ryan has made plain in every way possible that he isn’t running for president. Instead, he’s doing something just as important: attempting to fill the policy void left behind by a presidential nominating process that has been long on vacuous and impractical statements and short on actual plans for governing the country. Ryan is absolutely right that the House GOP should not defer to the party’s eventual nominee when it comes time to set an agenda for 2017 and beyond, because the likely nominees have shown almost no capacity for advancing an agenda that has any hope of being enacted, much less of working to promote strong economic growth. Wresting away control of the agenda wouldn’t be easy in the best of circumstances, given the wide latitude traditionally afforded the party’s nominee in shaping its platform. But this year it will be particularly tough, because much of what has been said on the campaign trail by the leading candidates needs to be refuted and abandoned rather than adopted by the party. This is especially true if Trump prevails and becomes the party’s nominee. Ryan is absolutely right that the House GOP should not defer to the party’s eventual nominee when it comes time to set an agenda for 2017 and beyond Among other things, Trump wants the United States to become protectionist. This is a terrible idea that will backfire. Since World War II, the United States has been the leading advocate for liberalizing global trade, to the great benefit of economic growth. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was ratified in 1947, and ushered in a period of profound and rapid economic growth among liberal democracies worldwide. Countless studies have documented that free trade speeds innovation and growth in productivity for the U.S. and other countries alike, thus boosting incomes and standards of living. It would be a catastrophic mistake for the U.S. to reverse course and begin unilaterally imposing tariffs on imported goods. Trump seems to think he can rip up 70 years of international treaties and renegotiate their terms from scratch, all without consequence. He is dead wrong. Those treaties have been carefully and painstakingly constructed with the cooperation of scores of countries. By unilaterally imposing tariffs, Trump would violate the terms agreed upon by past presidents of both parties, thus inviting sanctions and tariffs on U.S. exports. The result would be a massive contraction in trade flows and a likely recession. The long-term damage to U.S. prestige and leadership would be devastating. Both Trump and Cruz want the GOP to oppose the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiated by the Obama administration. They are wrong about this free-trade agreement, too. Estimates show the agreement will boost U.S. GDP by more than 1 percent in the years ahead. The main effect of the agreement is to substantially lower trade barriers in many Asian countries, to the benefit of American companies. There is no good reason to oppose it, other than fear of a populist backlash. The GOP would do great damage to its integrity if it were to give in to the threat of such a backlash, against all evidence and contrary to its own long history of promoting sensible trade policy. The dislocation that can sometimes occur with trade agreements is real. But it can be best addressed by helping those workers it affects, not by reversing course and imposing costs on all Americans. Workers should be supported during the transition periods of a new trade agreement, with wage support, training, and relocation assistance. But it would be shameful for the GOP to give in to protectionist impulses stoked by self-serving political opportunists. On fiscal and tax policy, Trump is just as delusional. He claims he will cut taxes by $10 trillion over a decade, fully protect entitlement spending, and still eliminate the federal government’s entire debt. This is absurd. Trump has no plan to actually cut spending, and never will. The nation is heading toward a fiscal crisis driven by rapidly escalating entitlement spending. Trump would accelerate that crisis, and it would be disastrous for Republicans, after years of warning that a crisis was coming, to change positions and join him in making it worse. It is true that Cruz’s fiscal- and tax-policy positions are less worrisome than Trump’s, but that isn’t saying much. To date, Cruz has offered very little by way of a practical policy agenda, and what he has said has been either completely farfetched or entirely irrelevant to what actually needs to be done. He touts a flat tax and a VAT to replace the income tax, and proposes eliminating the IRS. There is no prospect of replacing the entire progressive income tax with a single income-tax rate — 10 percent in Cruz’s plan — because of the large tax cut it would represent for the wealthiest Americans. And there’s even less prospect of eliminating the IRS without creating a replacement agency to assume its responsibilities. Moreover, despite suggesting he is an ardent fiscal conservative, Cruz has proposed almost no real spending cuts. He backs a “Five for Freedom” plan: He says he wants to eliminate the Departments of Commerce, Education, Energy, and Housing and Urban Development, in addition to the IRS. But what he actually means to do is move most of their main functions to other departments, eliminating only a very small and inconsequential number of their programs. This plan would not come close to covering the revenue lost by his tax plan, much less to narrowing the large deficits that he has denounced so fervently since arriving in the Senate. On health care, Trump and Cruz both say they want to repeal Obamacare, but neither man has offered anything close to a credible replacement plan. Among other things, their positions would leave the GOP vulnerable to the accusation that it cares nothing for people with expensive pre-existing conditions (despite Trump’s claims to the contrary). One of the most important aspects of Ryan’s effort is to articulate a practical and credible market-based plan to provide all Americans secure health insurance without Obamacare’s immense expense and bureaucracy. The United States desperately needs an ambitious but practical pro-growth agenda. An agenda focused on tax and entitlement reforms that can pass in Congress, replacing Obamacare with a market-based alternative, rolling back costly regulations on businesses, scaling back long-term fiscal liabilities, and improving worker productivity through better education and training. Unfortunately, the leading GOP candidates for president have given no indication that they are up to the task of articulating such an agenda. So it will be left to Paul Ryan and his House colleagues to fill the inevitable void. Better that than no realistic agenda at all. — James C. Capretta is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Bill Clinton trespassed against the cardinal rule of contemporary Democratic politics, which is: Thou shalt not contradict Black Lives Matter protesters. Clinton’s lapse came at a Philadelphia rall…

Paul Ryan?s statement Tuesday that he will not under any circumstances be the Republican Party?s presidential nominee this year is about as absolute and definitive as anyone could utter…

The Ryerson Men's Issues Awareness Society (MIAS) applied last fall for official student group status, but was rejected on the grounds it's anti-feminist and violates the union's 'core equity values'

The founding father was born on April 13, 1743.

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton hold substantial leads in New York and are poised to regain some momentum in next Tuesday’s primaries, a new poll finds.

As the Obama administration this week named another warship after a politician, a new report is circulating in Congress that shows that nearly 200 Navy and Marine Corps Medal of Honor recipients have never been awarded such an honor, contrary to naval guidelines and tradition.

The Simple Flat Tax Plan Summary “Imagine 4.9 million new jobs. Instead of Obama’s income stagnation, imagine average wages rising 12.2 percent over the next decade. Capital investment rising 43.9 percent. And every income-level seeing double-digit increases in after-tax income. Imagine exports and manufacturing jobs booming. Our trade deficit falling as the tax bias against American made goods is eliminated. …

There are questions over the apparent lack of any due diligence assessment carried out on Donald Trump by Scottish ministers when considering his grand golf resort scheme, which could have revealed aspects of his business dealings that might have rung alarm bells.

The LGBT mob threatens states with economic and social violence because they know it works. Its latest target is North Carolina, but it won't be the last.

Hillary gets away with racism, Trump complains about the system, and Chris Matthews discovers his erogenous zones. Subscribe to watch (FREE 30 day trial): ht...

The key domestic policy fight of 2017 will be over Obamacare. If it is repealed, then the centerpiece of the Obama presidency will lie in ruins. If not, then President Obama will have been what he set out to be: a sort of Reagan of the left—a transformative president who will have profoundly changed the direction of the country. If Donald Trump is the Republican nominee, he won't win—or even wage—a fight to repeal Obama's namesake. Trump has declared during this campaign that single payer heath care works incredibly well in Scotland. He has repeatedly indicated that, despite our nearly $20 trillion national debt, he has no real interest in tackling the entitlement spending that is bankrupting us. And when asked a few weeks ago to give his opinion on what the top three functions of the United States government are, he said one of them is health care. This is not a man who intends to repeal Obamacare. Sure, Trump checks the rhetorical box in saying the opposite, knowing that to do otherwise would be to commit political suicide in a Republican primary. But in addition to his general enthusiasm for government monopolies over health care abroad, disdain for entitlement reform, and belief that the provision of health care is one of the federal government's three core functions, Trump's campaign has indicated even more specifically why repeal would be a pipe dream under a Trump presidency.

Ted Cruz is smarter than your typical presidential candidate. While Cruz’s political rivals chase birth certificates and point to eligibility lawsuits from

So he stays on the primary ballot.

Donald Trump has alleged the GOP's selection process was "absolutely rigged ... a phony deal" after Ted Cruz swept Colorado's 34 delegates.

Senator Ted Cruz went off on Donald Trump during an interview Tuesday with radio host Glenn Beck. Cruz called the ...

Donald Trump says his business experience would make him a good president., but how exactly did he make his money?

Thanks to some good old-fashioned reporting, we now have an idea of how little cash Trump has given away.

The Pentagon’s stockpile of air-to-ground munitions has suffered an unexpected dip — and it may take a long time to restore it.

Scores of people assigned to vote for Donald Trump don’t actually support him.